Microleakage and bacterial adhesion with three restorative materials used to seal screw-access channels of implant abutments: An <i>in vitro</i> study
| dc.contributor.author | AlQarawi, Firas | |
| dc.contributor.author | AlShammasi, Baneen | |
| dc.contributor.author | AlBasry, Zainab | |
| dc.contributor.author | AlAwami, Heba | |
| dc.contributor.author | AlEraky, Doaa | |
| dc.contributor.author | AlJindan, Reem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alrumaih, HamadAlshahrani, Faris | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-29T09:01:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-29T09:01:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description | 241-247 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background:Proper sealing of screw-access channels against microbial microleakage is advisable for the long-term success of screw-retained implant prosthesis. Objective: This study aimed to compare the bacterial adhesion and microleakage with three restorative materials, namely, composite resin, acrylic resin and bis-acryl, that are used to cover the access channels of screw-retained implant prostheses, using polytetrafluoroethylene tape as a spacer material. Materials and Methods: In this <i>in vitro</i> study, 18 titanium straight abutments (Hex-lock<sup>®</sup> Zimmer) were torqued into implant analogs, which were then subdivided into three groups. The samples of each group were filled with polytetrafluoroethylene tape and sealed with the three restorative materials (Group A: composite resin; Group B: acrylic resin; Group C: bis-acryl). Measurements of surface bacterial adhesion and internal microleakage were then recorded. The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests. Results: No significant difference was found between the investigated materials in terms of their sealing effectiveness against microbial microleakage (<i>P</i> = 0.06). Regarding bacterial adhesion, composite resin showed the highest number of surface adhesion, but there was no significant difference between the three materials (<i>P</i> = 0.081). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that composite resin, acrylic resin and bis-acryl materials could be used alternatively in sealing the implant access channel owing to no significant differences in terms of microleakage and bacterial adhesion. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | ISBN/1658-631X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sjmms.net/text.asp?2021/9/3/241/325589 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iau.edu.sa/handle/123456789/322 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | Microleakage and bacterial adhesion with three restorative materials used to seal screw-access channels of implant abutments: An <i>in vitro</i> study | |
| dc.type | Article |
