Management options in hepatic hydatid disease
| dc.contributor.author | Yasawy, Mohamed | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-11T11:22:53Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-31T10:36:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-10-11T11:22:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-03-31T10:36:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.description | Pages 90-94 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this retrospective study is to analyse the outcome of 4 different methods in management of hepatic hydatid disease. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> The study was carried out in the Military Hospital, Riyadh: 110 patients were included; 37 were treated medically; 26 patients were subjected to percutaneous drainage via ultrasound guidance. Fifty patients required surgical treatment, while the remaining 10 patients were managed endoscopically. <b>Results:</b> The study showed different responses of the 4 methods applied. <b>Conclusion:</b> This retrospective analysis revealed that percutaneous draiange of the hydrated cysts achieved the best yield among all other methods. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1658-631X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sjmms.net/text.asp?2014/2/2/90/136994 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iau.edu.sa/handle/123456789/7434 | |
| dc.title | Management options in hepatic hydatid disease | en_US |
| dc.type | Article |